Pro: Learn & Trade With Us

2 new Forex video courses + private forum + trade review + video watchlists

Apply Here

Home / Beginners / It’s Not Your Fault That You Are Losing – 18 Biases That Explain Why Traders Make Mistakes

It’s Not Your Fault That You Are Losing – 18 Biases That Explain Why Traders Make Mistakes

The human brain is a fascinating machine. It allows us to do many things simultaneously without having to think about doing them. You can drive a car, have a conversation about a complex topic on the phone, eating a sandwich, observing your daughter on the back seat, while all your inner organs and body mechanisms do their thing; this all happens effortlessly and humans wouldn’t be able to consciously control what is going on anyways.

This is only possible because our brain uses shortcuts to process data and information automatically. Unfortunately, those shortcuts don’t always work in our advantage and especially trading and investing require a different skill set and way of thinking.

The automation of thinking and making decisions is done through psychological biases or heuristics. We compiled a list of the 18 most common biases and heuristics and show how they influence trading decisions.

“This is the essence of intuitive heuristics: when faced with a difficult question, we often answer an easier one instead, usually without noticing the substitution.” – Kahnemann



What it means…

How it influences traders

Availability People estimate the likelihood of an event based on how easily it can be recalled. Traders put too much emphasis on their most recent trades and let recent results interfere with their trading decisions.
Dilution effect Irrelevant data weakens other more relevant data. Using too many tools and trading concepts to analyze price could weaken the importance of the core decision drivers.
Gambler’s fallacy People believe that probabilities have to even each other out in the short term. Traders misinterpret randomness and believe that after three losing trades, a winning trade is more likely. The probabilities don’t change based on past results.
Anchoring Overestimating the importance of the first available piece of information. Upon entering a trade, people set their whole chart and analysis in reference to their entry price and don’t see the whole picture objectively anymore.
Insensitivity to sample size Underestimating the variance for large and small sample sizes. Traders too often make assumptions about the accuracy of their system based on just a few trades, or even change parameters after only a few losers.
Contagion heuristic Avoiding contact with objects people see as “contaminated” by previous contact. Traders avoid markets/instruments after having a large loss in that instrument, even when the loss was the fault of the trader.
Hindsight We see things that have already occurred as more probable than they were before they took place. Looking back on your trades and fishing for explanations why the trade has failed, even though those signals weren’t obvious at the time.


Hot-hand fallacy After a success with a random event, another success is more likely. Traders believe that once they are in a winning streak, things become easier and they can “feel” what the market is going to do next.
Peak–end rule People judge an event based on how they felt at the peak of the event. Traders look at a losing trade and only see how much they were in profit at the maximum, but don’t look at what went wrong afterwards.
Simulation heuristic People feel more regret if they miss an event only by a little. Price that missed your target only by a little bit or a trade where you got stopped out just by a few points can be more painful than other trades.
Social proof If unsure what to do, people look for what other people did. Traders too often ask for advice from other traders when they are not sure what to do – even when other traders have a completely different trading strategy.
Framing People make decisions based on how it is presented; a gain is more valuable than a loss and a sure gain is more valuable than a probabilistic greater gain. Traders close profitable trades too early because they value current profits more than a potentially larger profit in the future.
Sunk cost We will invest in something just because we have already invested in it. before Adding to losing trades because you are already invested, even though no objective reason to add exists.
Confirmation Only looking for information that confirms your beliefs, ideas and actions. Blanking out reasons and signals that don’t support your trade and just looking for confirmation.
Overconfidence People have a higher confidence than what their level of skill actually suggests. Traders misjudge their level of expertise and skill. Consistently losing traders don’t see that it’s their fault.
Selective perception Forgetting those things that caused discomfort. Traders forget easily that their own mistakes and wrong trading decisions caused their major losses.
Beneffectance Feeling responsible for positive outcomes but not for inferable outcomes. Traders blame the markets or unfair circumstances for their losses and take full responsibility for their winners.


Download your Heuristics cheat sheet

Learn our two trading strategies in our step by step video course and join the private member forum and interact with us daily.

New: Tradeciety Pro Trading Courses


  1. Hi. Interesting post. I just want to comment on the framing part.

    Framing – “Traders close profitable trades too early because they value current profits more than a potentially larger profit in the future”.

    I have to disagree. Everyone would value a greater profit in the future, the problem is rather the fear of losing some gain, a big part of the gain or even to turn a win into a loss. So in short, fear rather than the value of current profits.

    I like to scale out of a win to secure some profits, at least when I trade some brokerage free instruments we have in Sweden (mini long- and mini short warrants), but I usually scale out small, something like 10-20

    shares each sale of a total of maybe 170 shares (as an example).

    But if I have to pay a brokerage fee, I wait longer, usually until I feel it’s closer to the end of the move (or when the price turns or the end of lower lows/highs / higher highs/lows i.e. end of trend in my time frame), then I

    sell it all or scale out two times 50% and then the remaining 50%, this is of course a bit harder. The scale out version is usually only used when I feel we are close to the end of the move, not when the price or trend has



    • Hello Daniel
      Yes, trading is not only black or white and there are many ways to make a living in the markets.
      I wanted to highlight a very common problem many traders have and a wrong approach. If you can back up your decisions with collected performance data from your journal, then it’s all good. Unfortunately, most people never spend the time to evaluate what they are doing is really improving their trading.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want to become a better trader?
Learn our two trading strategies and trade with us

Liked the article? Please share to spread the word